果冻传煤

God Bless the USA & The Dodgers

by Tom Knecht, Professor of Political Science


Tom Knecht

I鈥檒l discuss the semiquincentennial* 鈥 a word I just learned 鈥 through a topic that may seem totally out of left 铿乪ld: sports.

Why sports?

I鈥檓 working under a deadline for a book on the politics of American sports as well as this article, so I鈥檓 trying to kill two birds with one stone. But more importantly, I think sports can tell us a lot about what it means to be an American.

鈥淣ation-states鈥 and 鈥渟ports teams鈥 fall into a category of things 鈥 money, corporations, Valentine鈥檚 Day and zombies among them 鈥 that exist in our collective imagination but not in the state of nature. The land along either side of the U.S. border looks identical; only signs or fences can distinguish 鈥渉ere鈥 from 鈥渢here.鈥 And with free agency and the NCAA transfer portal shaking up rosters every year, uniforms rather than the players now tend to de铿乶e sports teams.

Saying that nation-states and sports teams exist in our collective imagination doesn鈥檛 make them any less real. The political scientist Benedict Anderson called nation-states 鈥渋magined communities鈥 that unite complete strangers. We tend to feel it more deeply when good or bad things happen to other Americans. Maybe we shouldn鈥檛, but most of us do. Similarly, I鈥檝e been hugged and high-铿乿ed by random people at Dodger Stadium after a walk-off homer, a joyful sense of human connection bordering on ecstasy. Our nation and our teams can provide very real social bonds that give us a sense of belonging and tell us who is, or isn鈥檛, part of our team.

There鈥檚 no guarantee that a nation-state or sports team can build a shared identity. In fact, both struggle with the same challenge: How to get a diverse group of people, each with their own identities and interests, to work together as a team.

They set about that task in a remarkably similar fashion.

Colors and Symbols. Americans learn from an early age to recognize the red, white and blue on the stars and stripes as our colors and our 铿俛g.

Every sports team has its own colors and symbols that carry special meaning to players and fans. Just think of how beautiful that Dodger blue is compared to those clownish, Halloween-themed uniforms the team up north wears.

Songs and Pledges. Most Americans learn the national anthem and Pledge of Allegiance in kindergarten.

Every USC fan knows to throw up the V-is-for-victory sign as the band plays 鈥淔ight On,鈥 which annoyingly happens at least 97 times per game (unfortunately, more lately if they鈥檙e playing Stanford).

Myths. In this context, scholars use the term 鈥渕yth鈥 to describe (a) stories that most people in a given society know, and (b) de铿乶e important values or describe fundamental truths to and for that society. Myths may or may not be factually true.

Consider the story of the Declaration of Independence. We all know that Americans got fed up with taxes, so the Sons of Liberty dumped a bunch of tea into Boston Harbor, all the while shouting 鈥淣o taxation without representation!鈥 Now we drink coffee. Some historians, including Niall Ferguson and Charles Arnold-Baker, have questioned that story, pointing out that the 1773 Tea Act actually lowered tea prices, which helped most colonists but hurt racketeers like John Hancock. I鈥檒l leave it to historians to decide which version is most accurate, but the story teaches a fundamental truth of American politics: people should have a voice in the taxes they pay.

Sports are full of myths. When I watched the U.S. men鈥檚 hockey team beat Canada to win the gold medal a few months ago, I lost track of how many times NBC mentioned the 1980 Miracle on Ice. The 1980 U.S. men鈥檚 hockey team, a ragtag group of college kids, faced the four-time defending gold medalist Soviet Union in a semi铿乶al game. In arguably the greatest upset in sports history, the USA defeated the Soviets 4-3. That win has become part of American lore: a story of how a scrappy band of underdogs took down the Evil Empire, and in doing so, united a divided nation and helped pull the United States out of its 1970s malaise. Is that story truth, hyperbole, or somewhere in between? That鈥檚 the thing with myths; it鈥檚 often hard to tell.

Ideas. Historians and political scientists often describe America as an idea and note that anyone can be an American. The Declaration of Independence states, 鈥淲e hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.鈥

Of course, things in America have never been that simple. The country has never fully lived up to its high ideals, and we keep debating who is and isn鈥檛 a real American. Maybe we鈥檇 do better to think that being American means deliberating over fundamental principles, recognizing when reality falls short of aspirations and then 铿乶ding ways to bridge that gap.

Ideas also define sports teams. Some have grandiose mission statements, like 鈥淐ommitment to Excellence鈥 (Las Vegas Raiders鈥a!) or 鈥淧lay Like a Champion Today鈥 (which originally came from Oklahoma Sooners coach Bud Wilkinson but Notre Dame later ripped it off). Others characterize themselves by a strategic philosophy: The Steelers play D, the Chiefs throw the ball, and the Browns lose games.

A Common Enemy. Nothing de铿 nes 鈥渦s鈥 better than a hated 鈥渢hem.鈥 Patriotism and national unity peak during times of war and con铿俰ct, such as World War II or the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

Certainly, heated rivalries abound in the sports world: Yankees/Red Sox; Michigan/Ohio State; Auburn/Alabama or 果冻传煤/Biola.

The Payoff Pitch

Being part of a team yields many great things and bene铿乼s, whether as a citizen, player or fan. We all need community and a sense of belonging, and things often work better when people give of themselves for the greater good.

But all this identity-building creates dilemmas. A lack of shared identity can result in a weak state or a losing team. Too strong of an identity can turn into hyper-nationalism or sports hooliganism. Lines between such extremes may not always seem clear. Patriotism can easily evolve into nationalism; good-natured trash-talk (which I hope you鈥檝e recognized in my words) can quickly escalate into 铿乬hts in the parking lot (which I very much wish to avoid).

It also raises dilemmas for us as individuals. What if we don鈥檛 feel like part of the team? What if we鈥檙e not allowed on the team? What if we believe the team is heading in the wrong direction? Can I say that my team is objectively better than others, or do I just prefer it? What if I have a different understanding of which team I鈥檓 on? And how does all this team talk 铿乼 with my faith?

Finally, it鈥檚 important to re铿 ect on our team鈥檚 state during this milestone: our 250th anniversary. Is our team united or divided? If divided, how can we come together?

So happy anniversary, America! And go 果冻传煤, Stanford, Dodgers, Rams, Lakers, Sparks, Galaxy and Dons!

*The day or year that is 250 years after a particular event, especially the independence of a country or the founding of a place.

This is a story from the Spring 2026 果冻传煤 Magazine